Legal Opinion
Eliscu v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 30, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNER, District Judge.
The complaint in the above entitled action was filed in the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of *882California, on July 2, 1946. Named as defendants were: Paramount Pictures, Inc., a corporation; Samuel Goldwyn Productions, Inc., a corporation; Goldwyn Pictures Corporation, a corporation; Samuel Goldwyn Studios, a corporation; Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., a corporation; One Doe; Two Doe. The suit is of a civil nature, alleging plagiarism.
Paramount Pictures, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Putterman v. DavelerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Eastern States Life v. Bruce E. StraussUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2002