Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. St. Louis Transit Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — No». War- ■ tuick Rough, Judge. The wife and daughter, residing with plaintiff and part of his household and family, may have nursed plaintiff, but “such nursing involves no legal liability on his part, and therefore affords no basis for a claim against defendant as for expenses paid.” Yoorhies on Damages, p. 29, sec. 18. Goodhart v. Bailroad, 177 Pa.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — No». War- ■ tuick Rough, Judge. The wife and daughter, residing with plaintiff and part of his household and family, may have nursed plaintiff, but “such nursing involves no legal liability on his part, and therefore affords no basis for a claim against defendant as for expenses paid.” Yoorhies on Damages, p. 29, sec. 18. Goodhart v. Bailroad, 177 Pa. St. 191, 35 Atl. 192; Buelterman v. Meyer, 132 Mo-. 474, 34 S. W. 67; Batcliff v. Lumpee, 82 Mo. App. 335; Wood v. Flanery, 89 Mo. App. 632; Doan v. Dale, 90 Mo. App. 87.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

— This plaintiff got a verdict for injuries received in boarding one of the defendant’s street cars by the premature starting of the car before he had obtained a secure footing in it. The physician who attended him testified as to the condition the plaintiff was in when last examined and that he was suffering then from a concussion of the spinal cord and- brain. He was asked if it was a permanent injury and said he could not answer that question because he had not examined the patient lately. The physician stated the visible symptoms resulting from the injury to the spinal *710cord, chief of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murray v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Brosnan v. SweetserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Trapnell v. City of Red Oak JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Crouse v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Manning v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Daniels v. CelesteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Bruce v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Gillen v. HaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API