Legal Opinion

Hobgood v. Neely

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1976No. 52275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

Where a trial judge orally announces the sustaining of a defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and prior to the reduction of said ruling to writing and its filing with the clerk of the court below, the complainant appellant, on the same day the oral ruling is made files with the clerk of the court below his voluntary dismissal of his complaint under Section 41 (a) of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 653; Code Ann. § 81A-141 (a)) the voluntary dismissal is effective and controlling, and the subsequent reduction of the ruling to writing and the filing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Panacon Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Wilson v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Smith v. A.H. Robins Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Hambrick v. Fidelity Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API