Snelling v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Tillman county on a charge of having possession of whisky with the intent to sell, and appeals. He assigns as error the following: First, error in excluding certain evidence offered by the plaintiff in error; second, error in the court’s instructions to the jury; third, the insufficiency of the evidence.
It appears from the record that the plaintiff in error and a negro were in a car transporting two 5-gallon jugs of whisky when arrested. The negro was one of the principal witnesses against the plaintiff in error.
In the trial of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kimbrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Tunnard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Milton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snelling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928