Legal Opinion

In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 11, 2012No. MDL No. 2359Published

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in the District of Minnesota Picht action moves to centralize this litigation in the District of Minnesota or, alternatively, in the Central District of California. This litigation currently consists of four actions pending in the Central District of California, the Middle District of Florida, and the District of Minnesota, as listed on Schedule A.1

Lone defendant James Hardie Building Products, Inc. (James Hardie), supports centralization in the District of Minnesota, but proposes the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Certainteed Fiber Cement Siding LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API