Legal Opinion
Walpert, Smullian & Blumenthal, P.A. v. Katz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 21, 2000No. 50, Sept. Term, 1998Published
1Opinion of the Court
762 A.2d 582 (2000)
361 Md. 645
WALPERT, SMULLIAN & BLUMENTHAL, P.A.
v.
George KATZ, et al.
No. 50, Sept. Term, 1998.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
November 21, 2000.
Kathleen A. Birrane, James P. Ulwick, (Kramon & Graham, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.
Ronald E. D'Anna (Steven G. Schwartz, Mattlin & McClosky, on the brief), Boca Raton, FL, for respondents.
Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY,[*] CHASANOW,[**] RAKER, WILNER and CATHELL, JJ.
BELL, Chief Judge.
This case presents the issue of under what circumstances, if any, absent a contractual relationship, an accountant is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited84 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.