United States v. Santiago
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge.
Defendant Ricardo Amaro Santiago (“Amaro”), challenges the jurisdiction of this court to sentence him, contending that the same is not a constitutional court under Article III of the United States Constitution. (See Docket No. 1029 at 6). Said motion is DENIED.
In 1966, President Lyndon Johnson signed Public Law 89-571, 80 Stat. 764, which transformed the territorial Article IV federal district court in Puerto Rico to a constitutional Article III one. The congressional intent for this monumental metamorphosis cannot be any clearer:
There does…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Examining Bd. of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores De OteroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Balzac v. Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Igartua-De-La-Rosa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aurelius Inv., LLC v. Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Edgar Reyes-Colon v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026