Conway v. Clinton
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District Court. The facts necessary to explain the-decision of the caso, appear in the Opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLowe, C. J.
the Court.
2DissentBoreman, J.
The Plaintiff sued the Defendants above named and three others for the malicious destruction of goods and chattels, and verdict and- judgment'- were rendered for Plaintiff against the- above named Defendants, who appeal.
The challenge by the Defendants to the array of. the petit jury was properly overruled. For aught, that appears the list from which they were -drawn was constituted in accordance with law.
In the.impannellingof the jury G-eo. W. Scott was challenged for cause by the Defendants, and the challenge denied, .which is-assigned as .error. , It appears* -however, -that he…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Gt. W. Turnpike Co. v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- McKown v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Patterson & Frisbie v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Bell v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Klink v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- State v. StenbackUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. HougensenUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Van Wagoner v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
- People of the Territory v. HughesUtah Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. HoptUtah Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.