Stutzman v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is a contest over the proceeds of a life insurance policy on the life of Albert S. Howard between Jacob A. Stutzman, his administrator, and Bertha J. Howard, his widow. The bill filed by the administrator was dismissed and he has appealed.
The policy as originally issued named his executor or administrator as beneficiary, with the right to change the beneficiary. Sometime before his death the insured changed the beneficiary and named his wife. It is contended that this was in fraud of his creditors, as he was insolvent at the time.
The administrator points to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Huff's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Appeal of Elliott's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- McKown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kenin's Trust Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Pearlman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Pearlman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
- Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.