Legal Opinion

International Association of Machinists v. Boeing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1963No. 18453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

1. We are satisfied that the District Court was in error in concluding that it was without jurisdiction to amend the preliminary injunction in the manner sought by the appellants’ motion.

2. Under the rationale of this Court’s decision in Seafarers International Union of North America, Pacific Dist. v. United States, 304 F.2d 437 (1962), an injunction issued under Section 208 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 178, should normally require maintenance of the status quo existing when the dispute arose, that is, in the usual case, a continuance of the terms and conditions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seafarers International Union Of North America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Association Of Machinists, Afl-Cio Et Al. v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API