John S. Gore v. Indiana University
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
When there are three job openings and a man fills the first position, it is an uphill battle for another man to prove that his gender is the reason why he was not selected. That is the task that John Gore faces in this case. Although Gore is convinced that only invidious reasons could explain Indiana University’s refusal to hire him as a lecturer, he needs more than his own conviction. The district court granted summary judgment for the University on Gore’s claim of gender bias, and we agree that he did not demonstrate any genuine issue of material fact that would require…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Douglas M. Mills v. Health Care Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ronald Sweatt v. Union Pacific Railroad CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Bernard Mlynczak, Thomas J. Balamut, Jurgis Paliulionis, and John D. Kasprowicz v. Samuel W. Bodman, Secretary, U.S. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Andrew Dunlevy v. James LangfelderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Farr v. St. Francis Hospital & Health CentersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Hosick v. Chicago State University Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.