Legal Opinion

(PC) O'Brien v. Said

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 4, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00741Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KORY T. O’BRIEN, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00741-NONE-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS 13 v. ) FOR SANCTIONS AND ENTRY OF DEFAULT ) 14 K. E. SAID, (ECF Nos. 64, 65) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Kory T. O’Brien is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions and motion for entry of default, 20 filed October 2, 2020 and October 7, 2020, respectively. (ECF Nos.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Jacqueline Payne Jacob Payne Randy W. Lowe Ferdinand Samuel v. Exxon Corporation Exxon Company USA Exxon Shipping Company and Veco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Forman v. Cecil McCall Chairman, United States Parole Commission, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Wyle v. R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API