Lord v. National Protective Society
Michigan Supreme Court
.Error to Lapeer; Smith, J. Assumpsitbj Leon Lord against the National Protective Society of Bay ■ City on a benefit certificate. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
This cause has been before us heretofore, and will be found reported in 129 Mich. 335 (88 N. W. 876), where an outline of the facts upon which it rests is stated. Upon the former trial, the court directed a verdict for the defendant, and his judgment was reversed, this court holding that, under the testimony,the court should not have decided that there was no waiver of the provisions of the policy. There was another question relating to damages. While our opinion in that case states that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant, it does not say that a verdict for the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lord v. National Protective SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pearson v. AnderburgUtah Supreme Court · 1905
- Larkin v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Downs v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911