Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Saul

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided June 28, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00194Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION MAGGIE R. ANDREWS, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-00194-N ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Maggie R. Andrews brought this action under

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (collectively, “DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Winschel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API