Legal Opinion
Donahue v. Calumet Fire-Clay Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky
Decided May 6, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On Motion to Remand.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The plaintiff Philip Donahue begun this action in the state court by filing his petition thereih on April 22, 1897. The plaintiff alleged in his petition'that the defendant was an Ohio corporation, and had its chief office in that state. A summons was issued, and attempted to be executed on various persons alleged, in one capacity or another, to be agents or officers of the defendant. On February 12, 1898, the defendant entered its special appearance, for the purpose and moved the court to quash the various returns on the summons. This motion after hearing was overruled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In Re Atlantic City RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Case v. OlneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1900
- Casement v. Soliant Health, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP v. RNO Exhibitions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021