Legal Opinion
Tudor Chateau Creole Apartments Partnership v. D.A. Exterminating Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1997No. 96 CA 0951PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I2FOGG, Judge.
By this suit, plaintiffs seek to recover payment for damages to their apartment complex caused by termites during the term of a pest control contract entered into by the parties. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs; defendants appeal.
The construction on the Tudor Chateau Creole Apartments (Chateau Creole) began in 1978. During the construction phase, D.A. Exterminating Co., Inc. provided the pretreatment for termites and, for the next- two years, Chateau Creole maintained a termite contract with D.A. Exterminating. After that period, the contract lapsed and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Barrie v. VP Exterminators, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- State v. VinzantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Hendry Corp. v. Aircraft Rescue VesselsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kent v. CobbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Blake v. City of Port AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Moss v. Town of RayvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Boudreaux v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRAN. AND DEV.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.