Hill v. Indiana Board of Public Welfare

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-petitioner Hazel Hill ("Hill") appeals the trial court's affirmation of the Indiana Board of Public Welfare's ("agency") determination that she owed the agency $1,387.00 due to overpayment of food stamp benefits. We affirm.

Issues

Hill presents four issues for review:

I. Whether the agency's notice of overis-suance of food stamp benefits gave Hill adequate procedural due process protections.

II. Whether the error resulting in the overissuance of food stamp benefits was properly categorized as inadvertent household error as defined in 7 C.F.R. § 278.-18(a)(1).

III…