Richardson v. Millard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Reynolds, J. P.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, granting respondent’s motion for permission to serve an amended complaint to add G. E. Van Vorst Co., Inc., as a party defendant in this action. The instant appeal was taken by William H. Millard and not G. E. Van Vorst Co. Millard is not a party aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 by the order adding an additional defendant (7 Weinstein-HornMiller, N. V. Civ. Frac., par. 5511.08). Accordingly, the appeal is improperly taken and must, therefore, be dismissed (Matter of Cannon, 278 App. Div. 742). Appeal…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Pinto v. HouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Giordano v. Grand Prix Sales, Service, Restoration Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Caballero v. CaballeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kearney v. GVGHA (Genesee Valley Group Health Ass'n)New York Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.