Legal Opinion

Brown v. McQueen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Bartholomew Probate Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This was an action of assumpsit for money had and received, commenced by McQueen, guardian, &c., against Brown in the Bartholomew Probate Court. The damages claimed were $50.00. Plea, non assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff.

The only question necessary to be considered is, whether the Court below had jurisdiction of the case? The act organizing Probate Courts, &c., (Rev. Stat., 1838, p. 173), invests that Court with jurisdiction “ in all suits, at law or in equity *upon all demands or causes of action in favour of or against heirs, executors, administrators, or guardians, where the amount in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. WintersIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Fisher v. PrewittIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API