Legal Opinion

Lohss and Sprenkle v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1974No. [No. 297, September Term, 1973.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

272 Md. 113 (1974)

321 A.2d 534

LOHSS AND SPRENKLE

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND

[No. 297, September Term, 1973.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 27, 1974.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and O'DONNELL, JJ.

Theodore G. Bloom, with whom were Albert J. Goodman and Goodman & Bloom on the brief, for Donald M. Sprenkle, Jr., one of appellants. Joseph H. Rouse, Assistant Public Defender, for Lawrence H. Lohss, other appellant.

James G. Klair, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and Clarence W. Sharp, Assistant…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Levine; Dissent.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Basoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Mugford v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API