Legal Opinion
State v. Atencio
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 18, 1973No. 1119PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute it. Section 54-11-20(A) (3), (B), N.M.S.A. 1953 (1972 Int.Supp.). He appeals. We affirm.
Defendant was charged with “Trafficking in a Controlled Substance, to-wit: Heroin, contrary to Chapter 84, New Mexico Laws 1972”; that defendant “did possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, to-wit: heroin.” The particular section of the Controlled Substances Act violated wás not stated.
A. Defendant was properly charged.
Section 54-ll-20(A) (3), (B) provides that it is unlawful for any person to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SerranoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. Sidney B. Rowlette and Robert Vecelli, A/K/A Robert Savio, United States of America v. Robert Vecelli, A/K/A Robert SavioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- William Herbert Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- City of Albuquerque v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Rickman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DiazNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HollandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bajart v. University of New MexicoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. PageNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.