Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farmers National Bank of Webster City v. Manke

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-234Published

1DissentSnell, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The majority has reversed the trial court relying on a specious reason. That reason, as stated by the majority, is that “the debt- or’s motives in selling the property” present a genuine issue of material fact. That being so, the majority finds a procedural error, stating that the trial court should not have decided this factual issue in a proceeding under section 639.63 to discharge an attachment.

The majority’s reason and its reliance are specious because the debtor’s motives are not disputed and therefore present no issue of material fact to be decided in a trial. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frudden Lumber Co. v. CliftonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Bell v. Courteen Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Rockport Co. v. Wedgewood, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API