Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of aiding escape; from city court of Columbus— Judge Tigner. April 23, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The defendant was convicted of violating § 315 of the Penal Code of 1895, which provides: “If any person shall aid, or assist, or attempt to aid or assist, a prisoner to escape, so confined or imprisoned, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” The expression, “so confined or iipprisoned,” refers to § 314 of the Penal Code, which provides: “If any person shall be convicted of an offense below the grade of felony, and shall escape from the chain-gang or other place of confinement or imprisonment for the violation of any municipal, county or State laws, and be thereafter retaken, he shall be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Orth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Hendrickson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.