Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Ascellon Corporation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 6, 2020No. 8:19-cv-02953Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ANNA CUMMINS, for herself and : on behalf of those similarly situated : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 19-2953 : ASCELLON CORPORATION : MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently pending in this wage dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) are (1) Plaintiff Anna Cummins’ corrected motion for notice and conditional certification (ECF No. 25), and (2) Plaintiff’s motion for equitable tolling for the purported members of that collective. (ECF No. 28). The issues have been fully briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. EQT Production Company v. Robert AdairCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API