Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Torres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs and so much of order as required security vacated. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, it was an abuse of discretion for Supreme Court to condition the grant of defendant’s vacatur application upon the posting of security. Here, there was no showing of any circumstances to warrant the requirement of posting security (see, Mark IV Homes v Evans Gardens, 57 AD2d 701, 702). Moreover, its imposition is inappropriate where, as here, it effectively serves to deprive a defendant of his day in court (see, Congress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. A & B America, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Rubin v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Congress Talcott Corp. v. Pacemakers Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. ZemrusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Mark IV Homes, Inc. v. Evans Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. WikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API