Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Printup, Brother & Pollard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Evidence. Principal and Agent. Debtor and Creditor. Before Judge LAWSON. Green Superior Court. September Adjourned Term, 1880. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

Printup. Bro. & Pollard sued J. H. Mitchell on an open account, amounting to $320.00, for guano sold to him. He pleaded in defence payment, and set-off in the sum of $408.55, for three bales of cotton purchased by E. G. Williams, agent.

The facts of the case, as appear by the record, are that Williams was the agent of the plaintiffs to sell guano, and *676sold that which is the subject of this litigation to the defendant. The cotton which the defendant seeks to set off was sold by him to Williams in 1875, who represented to defendant, Mitchell, that he had money in the hands of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bostick v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walton Guano Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Pinkston v. Cedar Hill Nursery & Orchard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Osborn v. War Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Cooper v. American Discount Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Fisher v. DarseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API