Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. George Hyman Construction Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 3, 1999No. 4-98-0570PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
On November 13, 1995, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) filed suit against Clark Construction Group, Inc. (Clark) (then known as George Hyman Construction Company (Hyman)), Clark’s subcontractors, and their respective sureties for breach of a contract to construct a large office building. Clark and its subcontractors filed cross-claims against each other. Now Clark has settled with State Farm and seeks to have the remaining cross-claims between it and the subcontractors arbitrated. The primary issues on appeal are whether the remaining cross-claims fall within the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily DistajoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- J&K Cement Construction, Inc. v. Montalbano Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bishop v. We Care Hair Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Caligiuri v. First Colony Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Schroeder Murchie Laya Associates, Ltd. v. 1000 West Lofts, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- La Hood v. Central Illinois Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.