Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Yablonsky

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 26, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

The usual issue of anticipation by prior patents. The 'art, if it may be called an art, is the placing (positioning in the jargon of patent solicitors and their specifications) of electric light filaments for effective highway reflection.

The pertinent principle of physics is conceded:

“Conversely, when a wave originates at the focus of a parabolic piirror it is reflected as a rigorously plane wave, that is, as a parallel beam. Hence the use of parabolic mirrors in search lights.” (Electricity, Sound, and Light, by Millikan and Mills, p. 287.)

It is further agreed that such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Essex Razor Blade Corp. v. Gillette Safety Razor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Essex Razor Blade Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API