Legal Opinion

Judson v. Buckley

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 20, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

The issues raised by the plaintiff’s reply to the first and second counterclaims set forth in the answer of the defendant are such as entitled the defendant to a trial by jury as a matter of right. See Moore’s Federal Practice, vol. 3, § 38.02, page 3009; American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., 260 U.S. 360, 43 S.Ct. 149, 67 L.Ed. 306; Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co. v. McKeen, 7 Cir., 64 F. 36; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Burger, D.C., 27 F.Supp. S54.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike out demand, conceded to have been timely served, denied and defendant’s motion granted.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Cincinnati, H. & D. R. v. McKeenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. RamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. JanichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
  3. Folkner v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. WigginsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  5. Noonan v. McGuire, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API