Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 24, 2018No. 118338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atcheson, J.:

The rule of lenity requires that ambiguous criminal statutes be read in favor of defendants. Valerie S. Baker gets the benefit of that rule here. As a result, we find the Johnson County District Court erred in ordering Baker to serve prison sentences on two forgery convictions, since she had already completed her probation on them even though she remained on a longer probation for a related theft conviction. We, therefore, reverse the district court's revocation of the forgery probations and vacate those prison sentences.

BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The underlying facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. Bennett.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  5. In Re the Estate of RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. RuwartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API