Legal Opinion

People v. Berkowitz

Utica City Court

Decided February 14, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold H. Hymes, J.

The defendant has been arraigned upon an information charging him with violating the Sabbath Law (Penal Law, § 2147). This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss this, information on the grounds (1) that the item of merchandise which was alleged to have been sold was excepted under subdivision 4 of section 2147, and (2) that section 2147 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional because it is vague and ambiguous.

■ Daw’s Drug Store is a chain store selling, not only drugs, medicines and other items usually associated with a pharmacy, but also miscellaneous and sundry items of general merchandise.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ShifrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. People v. WolenNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1936
  3. People v. KentNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BieleckiCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1968
  2. People v. AbrahamsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API