Legal Opinion
In Re Newman
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 30, 2001No. 97-11394, 97-17371, 99-12842, 99-15261, 99-17186, 99-12228, 99-17087, 98-16970, 01-10911PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLICATIONS FOR POST-CONFIRMATION ATTORNEY FEES
J. VINCENT AUG, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
These matters are before the Court on nine applications for attorney fees subsequent to plan confirmation filed by the same law firm in a three month period and the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objections thereto. In one case, In re Harris, the Debtor objected to the application. A hearing was held on October 11, 2001. 1
I. A Fee Application Must Be Prepared Based On Contemporaneous Time Records
The fee applications request compensation for legal services rendered as far back…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Mary Poole, Debtor. Russell A. Brown, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Michael T. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Woodward East Project, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- In Re DesiletsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- In Re C & a Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re Crawford Hardware, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re HirschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
- Law Offices of Kotlarsky v. RosenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- In re CrippsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
- In Re Vernon-WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- In re HartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.