Legal Opinion
Vidrine v. Constructors, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 2007No. 06-544PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOKS, Judge.
| STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This appeal arises from two asbestos exposure lawsuits.1 The Plaintiffs, weld*195ers, pipe fitters and their helpers, sued their employer, Constructors, IneJCon-structors), and Cleco, seeking damages for alleged exposure to asbestos during their employment with Constructors in the renovation of a Cleco utility plant. Eagle Pacific Insurance Company (Eagle), Constructor’s workers’ compensation insurer, filed a petition of intervention on the issue of insurance coverage and duty to defend. Eagle alleged the policy of insurance issued to Constructors’, which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Reeves v. Structural Preservation SystemsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Gales v. Gold Bond Bldg. ProductsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Schilling v. Bigelow Liptak Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bertrand v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Michael Smith, Et Ux. v. St. Landry Parish Solid Waste Disposal DistrictLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Smith v. St. Landry Parish Solid Waste Disposal DistrictLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011