Legal Opinion

In re Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding for the construction of a will, the appeal is from the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated June 26, 1988, which declared paragraph "third” of the last will and testament of Frances M. Nelson to be a valid legal devise of a fee on condition.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

The respondent James A. Nelson was the devisee under the decedent’s will of a certain parcel of real property. The devise stated, it pertinent part, as follows: "third: I give and devise to my husband, james a. nelson, if he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Towle v. . RemsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. In re the Estate of McLaughlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of LedererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. In re the Estate of BertramNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
  5. In re the Estate of McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suffolk Business Center, Inc. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. In re Di SienaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re BNY Mellon, N.A.New York Surrogate's Court · 2014
  4. Suffolk Business Center, Inc. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API