People v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AULT, J. pro tem. *
In an indictment returned by the Grand Jury of San Diego County, the defendants, Lorelie Brown, Arthur Lane and Barry Leichtling were charged in count I with transporting marijuana and in count II with possession of marijuana for sale. Before trial, defendants moved to suppress evidence under Penal Code, sed ion 1538.5 and to set aside the indictment under Penal Code, section 995. These motions were denied. Later, each defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty to count I of the indictment (transporting marijuana) and entered a plea of guiity to the lesser included offense…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. HenzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. McGaughranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BremmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Willett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.