Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph E. Kirkland, III
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1988No. 87-4542PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
I
This appeal challenges the denial of a motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) to strike the restitution provisions from a partially-suspended sentence and the conditions of probation. Joseph E. Kirkland, III, was indicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for concealing information relating to the use of a portion ($90,895) of a $1 million government loan extended to finance Kirkland’s company’s development of a housing project. Kirkland’s contract with the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) provided that FmHA would loan the development company money for use in construction, so…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Charles Ira BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Joseph PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Yvonne Harris and Josephine HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas A. Burger, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Juan JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Evan Miller (88-2272) and Jonathan Miller (89-1129)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ovie L. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.