In Re Bitter
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. In this case, we consider whether applicant Richard L. Bitter, Jr. has demonstrated the necessary good moral character and fitness for admission to the Vermont Bar. We conclude that applicant has failed to do so and deny him admission to the bar.
¶ 2. According to Vermont’s Rules of Admission to the Bar, an applicant must “possess good moral character and fitness.” V.R.A.B. § 11(a). “The purpose of requiring an applicant to possess present good moral character is to exclude from the practice of law those persons possessing character traits that are likely to result in injury to future…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- In Re Application of G. L. S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- In Re AntoniniNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Florida Board of Bar Examiners re B.H.A.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Robert GrundsteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re Eric S. Brittain, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In re HirschSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In Re Harry Taub (Office of Attorney Licensing)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- In re Eric S. Brittain, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017