Legal Opinion
City of Delta v. Charlesworth
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 15, 1918No. 8837PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The question to be determined is the validity of a part of an ordinance of the City of Delta. The portion involved reads: Error to Delta County Court, Hon, W. M. Dingman, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hill
“No person shall drink any malt, vinous, spirituous or other intoxicating liquors, while in any business house, store building, restaurant, hotel, livery stable, billiard hall, pool room, bowling alley, or within any street or alley, within the City of Delta, * * * unless the person occupying the building, shall be duly licensed by the City of Delta to sell intoxicating liquors.”
The complaints filed in the police court charged the defendants in error with drinking such liquors in a business house, store building, billiard hall, and pool room, in said city. Upon appeal to the County Court, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmidinger v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- People ex rel. Friend v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Cronin v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Schwartz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Adams v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. MusserIdaho Supreme Court · 1946