Legal Opinion
Edinger v. Borough of Portland
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 8, 2015PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON.
Robert Edinger (Appellant) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County (trial court), which granted the Borough of Portland’s (Borough) motion for summary judgment. We now affirm.
Appellant was employed by the Borough as a municipal police officer. In 2010, the Borough terminated Appellant’s employment, and Appellant filed a complaint with the trial court alleging, in part, that the Borough violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by depriving him of liberty without procedural due process as required by the 14th Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- LJL Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pyeritz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- C. Toland v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- C.A. Blesse v. Borough of CoaldaleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- G.T. Miller v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- N.T. v. Dept. of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- R. Rogers v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016