Legal Opinion

Rutar v. Hawes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

an action to recover damages for breach of contract, St. Francis College appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated June 3, 1988, as granted the plaintiffs motion to add it as a defendant and for leave to serve a supplemental summons and verified complaint adding it as a defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint (see, CPLR…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinzelberg v. Design Quest, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API