Legal Opinion
Garineh Baghdasarian v. Macys, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 2, 2021No. 2:21-cv-04153Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARINEH BAGHDASARIAN, Plaintiff, 12 Case No. 2:21-CV-04153-AB (MAAx) 13 v. 14 MACY’S, INC., MACY’S, MACY’S 15 DEPARTMENT STORES, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SHANNON GIANCOTTA, AND 16 REMAND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, 17 INCLUSIVE 18 Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff Garineh Baghdasarian’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 20 Remand (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 9). Defendants Macy’s, Inc., Macy’s, and Macy’s 21 Department Stores (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition (“Opp’n,” Dkt. No. 22 13). Plaintiff filed a reply…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.