State v. Mobley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the 19 September 2007 booking-area phone call under Rule 803(6) where testimony revealed the caller’s voice was similar to defendant’s, the caller identified himself as “Little Renny,” and the caller dialed the same number as defendant’s later calls from the jail. The circumstances of defendant initiating contact with the undercover officers and brokering the drug buy provide substantial evidence to support defendant’s conviction of conspiracy to sell a counterfeit controlled substance.
I. Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Franklin v. Maynard, Director, South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. HanifCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. HollisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.