Legal Opinion

Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Barondess

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by the defendant for judgment .on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings, consisting of a complaint and a demurrer thereto interposed upon the ground of insufficiency. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff now and at all times mentioned in the complaint is and was a foreign corporation of the state of Connecticut and that it “is authorized to transact business in the state of New York, and has offices for that purpose at No. 82 Beaver street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York.” The complaint then goes on to allege that the defendant procured from the plaintiff ' ' " *514a certificate of marine insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood Selick v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Bremer v. RingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Frick Co. v. PultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gerenstein v. WeinerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API