Legal Opinion

State v. Lanzo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Proctor, J.

Defendant, Charles Lanzo, was convicted of bookmaking (N. J. S. 2A.112-3) and of possession of lottery slips (N. J. S. 2A:121-3). He appealed, and we certified the matter before argument in the Appellate Division.

The defendant did not testify at the trial. The trial court, in the course of its charge to the jury, told them:

“Now, members of the jury, the defendant in this case did not take the stand. I charge you that under our law a defendant cannot be compelled to testify, but he is competent to testify and has the right to testify. His…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. State v. BogusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. State v. BontempoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. Padgett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. WadeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API