Legal Opinion

Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co. v. International Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1929No. 5355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to vacate and set aside the appointment of a receiver in a bank-ruptey proceeding. Appellees move to dismiss the appeal.

We gather from the record and the briefs and argument of counsel, that the material facts are as follows:

The Tucker Mercantile Company made an assignment of all its assets for the benefit of its creditors, which was accepted by practically all of them. However, the International Shoe Company (Peters Branch) did not accept, and, alleging the assignment as an act of bankruptcy, and that the unsecured creditors were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmers' State Bank of Texahoma v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drybrough v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. In Re Schulte-UnitedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Lubell Bros. v. M. J. L. Shoe Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  4. Irving Trust Co. of New York v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Ambassador Properties Corp. v. Ambassador Hotels Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API