Legal Opinion

Kaminitsky v. Northeastern Railroad

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justioe ¡VIoGowan.

This was an action against “The Northeastern Railroad Company” to recover damages for a personal injury. The plaintiff complained: “That on April 25, 18S3, while travelling in a wagon drawn by one horse along the public highway leading to the city of Charleston, which public highway crosses the railroad at a place called the crossing of the Meeting street road, near the place known as the forks of the road, and as the plaintiff had reached said crossing, the defendant carelessly and negligently caused one of the locomotives, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Dyer v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Sullivan v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. Loewen v. McDonnell, IIIDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API