Legal Opinion

In re Manayan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 2003-1542PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

*110{¶ 1} Applicant, Ben T. Manayan Jr. of Hudson, Ohio, was admitted in 1992 to the practice of law in Hawaii. On July 2, 2001, he applied for admission without examination to the practice of law in Ohio. See Gov.Bar R. 1(9).

{¶ 2} On January 15, 2002, three members of the Admissions Committee of the Akron Bar Association interviewed applicant to determine whether he was qualified for admission. See Gov.Bar R. I(9)(D). The interviewers learned that applicant, while residing in Hawaii, had failed to pay federal and state income taxes for a number of years. The interviewers nevertheless concluded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. StichterOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In re ParryOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In re Carr-WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. McCordOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re DickensOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re FordOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re KlineOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re MeffordOhio Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API