Legal Opinion

Smith v. Orange County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1986No. 85-1563Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment in a land dispute case. The pleadings presented various issues to be tried by the court: one legal issue, and three equitable issues.

Because appellant timely requested a jury trial in the trespass action1 the trial court erred in lumping the legal and equitable causes of actions together and in refusing to hold a jury trial. A mixture of legal and equitable claims in the same case cannot deprive a party of a timely requested jury trial on the legal issues. Cerrito v. Kovitch, 457 So.2d 1021 (Fla.1984); Hobbs v. Florida First Nat’l. Bank, 480 So.2d 153 (Fla.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Padgett v. First Federal S & L Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Cerrito v. KovitchSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Harris v. BadenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Hobbs v. FLORIDA FIRST NAT. BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Kies v. FLA. INS. GUAR. ASS'N, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API