Legal Opinion
State v. Zaman
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1999No. CV-98-0135-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
984 P.2d 528 (1999)
194 Ariz. 442
STATE of Arizona, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Akhtar ZAMAN (Tahirkhaili), Defendant-Appellant.
No. CV-98-0135-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
June 18, 1999.
Stephen G. Udall, Apache County Attorney By Shad L. Brown, Deputy County Attorney, St. Johns, Attorneys for the State of Arizona.
Trebon & Fine By John J. Trebon, Flagstaff, Attorneys for Akhtar Zaman (Tahirkhaili).
OPINION
MARTONE, Justice.
¶ 1 In State v. Zaman, 190 Ariz. 208, 946 P.2d 459 (1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1167, 140 L.Ed.2d 177 (1998), we held that the superior court has jurisdiction…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. McBratneySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.