Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Gong Bell Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 9, 1931No. 141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The decision on this petition depends solely upon whether the respondent was affiliated, under section 240 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1921, c. 136, 42 Stat. 227, 260, during the calendar year 1921, with Bevin Bros. Manufacturing Company, East Hampton Bell Company, and Bevin Wilcox Line Company. The respondent is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of toys and bells. Bevin Bros. Manufacturing Company is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of bells. East Hampton Bell Company is a corporation which manufactures bells and trolley wheels. Bevin Wilcox Line Company is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Adolph Hirsch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Ice Service Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Handy v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  2. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API